We have payload top mounts for our M300’s. If we mount the R2A on top (unit inverted), will
- the processing software handle this unit position? Would it be just adjusting the unit rotation specs during the processing, or…???
- when flown in non-GPS areas, how will this affect the Reach RS2 data collection, if any?
- possible flights would be in GPS and non-GPS areas…but would need to be merged during the processing phase. Is this possible?
- are there any other additional ways a mission such as this, would not be possible using the R2A and Reach RS2, M300 platform?
Thanks in Advance!!!
Make sure you post some pics! I’ve wanted to test this out myself. One item of note that I thought of when considering doing this would be to simply attach the GNSS antenna directly to the R2A (Sticky Mount on the back of the camera) as it is now exposed to the sky and this could potentially minimize the lever arm movement even more and therefore provide you even better data.
Of course the caveat with this is that using it in a GNSS denied environment for more than a few seconds is most certainly going to result in issues with data quality. Until we have a proper SLAM based module this is simply not an ideal solution. It does have tremendous potential however with the Facade mount that you are on the short list for.
figured as much on the processing of GPS-denied areas of the flight. we’ll have to just wait for the facade mounts to arrive, then. THANKS!!!